8 6, Japan mark 64 anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was the anti-nuclear, anti-war, anti-American demonstrators hold onto the city parade in Hiroshima, Japan
HC Network Security Recently, former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich in a speech in Washington, said that China needs in the near future, the denuclearization of the Korean and Japanese nuclear weapons, select one.
The United States as Japan's allies, after the request has to be in Japan, made its "nuclear umbrella" commitment, purpose is to discourage attempts to develop nuclear weapons in Japan. However, either in America or in Japan, hope the voice of the Japanese development of nuclear weapons, has never corpuscles. In North Korea "nuclear" has become uncertain circumstances, the Japanese asked to develop nuclear weapons will certainly be more intense the desire, the United States will change now is based on a "nuclear umbrella" and Policy ?
Treatment of the nuclear issue from the United States has always been a double Standard Approach see, can not rule out the possibility of nuclear armament in Japan with their acquiescence. But what the possibility is no doubt the need for careful assessment, of course, will never view the convergence. There is a very important decision to scale: Japan to develop nuclear weapons, is it just a threat to the DPRK and China, or pose a threat to the United States sooner or later? If only the former, then the possibility of large; If you also include the latter, this possibility will be greatly reduced.
Americans, then how much credibility? In my view, unreasonable. United States is a supreme national interest of countries, both allied or enemy, are from the U.S. interests, but also not allow any country to challenge the U.S. in the world "leadership position", of which naturally includes his allies. United States history, the losses have been eaten in Japan, "Pearl Harbor" is the eternal pain in the United States, he will never forget this history. Today, despite the passage of time, the United States and Japan by the enemies become allies, but Prevention Japan lost control of the situation in the re big, and even the United States again went to the opposite side, I think this would be a long-term strategic considerations in the United States, a necessary element.
This reason, the US-Japan alliance is by no means "iron plate", the two sides would rather play down the issue of future development, or even the "woolly-headed." In this case, the United States allows the Japanese nuclear weapons is unlikely to support or even help Japan build nuclear weapons, it is fantasy. Of course, Japan Technology Power point of view, he is fully capable of becoming a nuclear state, but no such domestic and international political climate, Japan wants crossed the "nuclear threshold" is never easy. Among these, the United States is critical constraints, as long as the United States to Japan out of control, the development of events will be difficult to predict.
View of this, former U.S. president's remarks, intimidation and pressure on the Chinese elements, is clearly a major. While the U.S. is now let out to talk about North Korean nuclear threat against the United States is not, on the other hand the risk of the spread of nuclear weapons in Japan, suggesting a possible nuclear threat posed by China, whose sole purpose is to make China "stuck" . Therefore, the United States played down the inevitable self-deception. China's principled position on the DPRK nuclear issue, the DPRK nuclear issue will not be a difficult situation now changed, it will not be distorted in some intimidation and pressure. On the DPRK nuclear issue, the United States need not play a "Japan card."
HC Network Security Recently, former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich in a speech in Washington, said that China needs in the near future, the denuclearization of the Korean and Japanese nuclear weapons, select one.
The United States as Japan's allies, after the request has to be in Japan, made its "nuclear umbrella" commitment, purpose is to discourage attempts to develop nuclear weapons in Japan. However, either in America or in Japan, hope the voice of the Japanese development of nuclear weapons, has never corpuscles. In North Korea "nuclear" has become uncertain circumstances, the Japanese asked to develop nuclear weapons will certainly be more intense the desire, the United States will change now is based on a "nuclear umbrella" and Policy ?
Treatment of the nuclear issue from the United States has always been a double Standard Approach see, can not rule out the possibility of nuclear armament in Japan with their acquiescence. But what the possibility is no doubt the need for careful assessment, of course, will never view the convergence. There is a very important decision to scale: Japan to develop nuclear weapons, is it just a threat to the DPRK and China, or pose a threat to the United States sooner or later? If only the former, then the possibility of large; If you also include the latter, this possibility will be greatly reduced.
Americans, then how much credibility? In my view, unreasonable. United States is a supreme national interest of countries, both allied or enemy, are from the U.S. interests, but also not allow any country to challenge the U.S. in the world "leadership position", of which naturally includes his allies. United States history, the losses have been eaten in Japan, "Pearl Harbor" is the eternal pain in the United States, he will never forget this history. Today, despite the passage of time, the United States and Japan by the enemies become allies, but Prevention Japan lost control of the situation in the re big, and even the United States again went to the opposite side, I think this would be a long-term strategic considerations in the United States, a necessary element.
This reason, the US-Japan alliance is by no means "iron plate", the two sides would rather play down the issue of future development, or even the "woolly-headed." In this case, the United States allows the Japanese nuclear weapons is unlikely to support or even help Japan build nuclear weapons, it is fantasy. Of course, Japan Technology Power point of view, he is fully capable of becoming a nuclear state, but no such domestic and international political climate, Japan wants crossed the "nuclear threshold" is never easy. Among these, the United States is critical constraints, as long as the United States to Japan out of control, the development of events will be difficult to predict.
View of this, former U.S. president's remarks, intimidation and pressure on the Chinese elements, is clearly a major. While the U.S. is now let out to talk about North Korean nuclear threat against the United States is not, on the other hand the risk of the spread of nuclear weapons in Japan, suggesting a possible nuclear threat posed by China, whose sole purpose is to make China "stuck" . Therefore, the United States played down the inevitable self-deception. China's principled position on the DPRK nuclear issue, the DPRK nuclear issue will not be a difficult situation now changed, it will not be distorted in some intimidation and pressure. On the DPRK nuclear issue, the United States need not play a "Japan card."
